Moi and others speculated what the March 17, press conference would be about. See Apparently Seattle Public Schools to Hold a 3/17 News Conference Now we know. After the recent scandals involving the Seattle Public Schools, the district and the City of Seattle are negotiating a memorandum of understanding which allows Seattle’s Ethics Department to handle ethics complaints from school district employees. The memorandum is signed by Board President Sundquist and Wayne Barnett, Executive Director of the Seattle EthicsElections Commission. Here is the memorandum
See, Steve Miletich and Linda Shaw’s Seattle Times article, Seattle Ethics Panel May Handle Seattle School Whistle-Blower Complaints and Scott Guterriez’ Seattle PI.Com post, Following Scandal, Outside Agency Will Handle School Complaints
Miletich and Shaw report the following:
The agreement would place district ethics investigations in the hands of an independent agency with years of experience in such cases. It also likely would be the first time a school district in Washington has relinquished this authority.
Under the arrangement, the Ethics and Elections Commission would investigate allegations of ethics violations by district employees, complaints brought by whistle-blowers and allegations of retaliation against whistle-blowers.
The school district would continue to set its own ethics policies and determine punishment for violations.
“This is a great step on the part of the district,” said Seattle City Councilmember Tim Burgess, who, as chairman of the council’s education committee, brokered the deal along with Councilmember Sally Clark.
Burgess, calling schools a critical part of the city, said he is concerned that the public will unfairly link the scandal in the district’s small-business contracting program to a proposed $231 million city levy for schools and families.
The council will decide in the next two weeks whether to put the levy on the November ballot. Although the city would control how the money is spent, the levy would support a number of public-school programs.
School Board Vice President Michael DeBell said he was intrigued by the idea of the city handling the district’s ethics and whistle-blower investigations.
“It looks like an opportunity for us to tap into the accumulated experience of the staff in the city that have been doing it for a while,” he said.
Noel Treat, the district’s general counsel, and Wayne Barnett, executive director of the Ethics and Elections Commission, said Wednesday they began working on the agreement in the last two weeks….
Auditors also found that an “atmosphere of fear, intimidation and reprisal” within the district contributed to a lack of oversight of the program, which they characterized as a rogue enterprise riddled with cronyism.
District employees told auditors they were met with threats or indifference when they tried to report irregularities in the program — or didn’t come forward because they were afraid of retribution or weren’t aware of how to make complaints….
The proposed city-district agreement would be limited to ethics and whistle-blower complaints, said Treat. Allegations of illegal activities would continue to be turned over to law enforcement, he said, and complaints about poor job performance would still be handled by district administrators.
“This would not in any way undermine the authority that state agencies or law enforcement have,” he said. “This is a supplement to that.”
The agreement also calls for the city to provide ethics training for all school-district employees.
The hope is to have a final agreement ready to be approved by the city council and the school board by the middle of April.
Treat said he hopes the proposed agreement will help change the culture of Seattle Public Schools, by giving employees and citizens confidence that their complaints will be taken seriously, and that they will be protected from retaliation.
Barnett said the commission’s independence “gives people confidence in the work we do,” and has let city employees “know they have a safe place” to lodge complaints.
“Ideally, we can be that body for the school district,” he said.
He said Thursday that the commission might not even tell the school district about some complaints if it felt that might taint its investigation.
The district would pay the city for the commission’s services, but the amount has yet to be negotiated. Some board members hope that it might be less expensive than hiring outside investigators, as the district has done in the past.
Over the past few months, the district had already taken steps to beef up its ethics program. It designated Treat as the district’s ethics officer, installed an anonymous hotline, established an ethics web page and developed procedures to investigate complaints.
The district also is in the process of strengthening its ethics policies and, under the proposed agreement, is asking the city to make recommendations about what changes should be made.
Sundquist said the district and city continue to talk about other ways that the city might assist the district as well.
Moi is scratching her head. Everything was honky dory when the board extended Dr. Goodloe-Johnson’s contract. Now, it looks like the administration has thrown in the towel and admitted the culture is just too dysfunctional and they are willing to cede a fair amount of control to an outside agency. Why not go all the way and totally eliminate the current institutional structure?
The Opinion of Paul Guppy of WPC About Families and Education Levy
A New Trojan Horse? The Families and Education Levy
Washington Should Adopt A Strong Charter School Law
It Is Time to Consider Charter School Authorization In Washington?
Charter Schools As A Catalyst For Better Public Schools
Dr. Wilda may be contacted at email@example.com
To receive updates from the Seattle Public Education Examiner, just click “subscribe” at the top of the story and enter your email address, which will not be shared.
Dr. Wilda says this about that ©